The nonprofit History News Network is reporting that in an informal survey of 109 historians, 98.2 percent considered President George W. Bush’s presidency to be a failure, while 1.8 percent called it a success.
On the question of whether he is the worst president in history, there was greater difference of opinion: 61 percent said he was, while others disagreed or are withholding their opinions. (The survey also made clear that James Buchanan has some work to do rehabilitating his whole catapulted-the-nation-into-Civil-War reputation.)
We take most unscientific surveys with a large grain of salt, and this certainly falls into that category. On the other hand, we like the idea of historians starting to think about the George W. Bush presidency, and how it fits into larger patterns of American history.
We’d be interested in knowing more about the 1.8 percent of historians who regard this presidency as a success.
Given the disastrous Iraq War, the sub-prime mortgage meltdown, the economy hurtling toward recession, the huge budget deficits, the plummeting dollar — to name just a few problems — these historians sound a lot like the 20 percent of dentists who don’t recommend sugarless gum for their patients who chew gum.
....Don’t forget the gutting of our environmental laws by executive fiat, the approval of torture, the politicization of the DOJ (when were you last asked what party you belonged to, in a job interview?), the militarization of space, the ridiculous emphasis on manned space flight, wiretapping of american citizens, killing iraqi civilians, destruction of the Bagdad museum, disrespect and defunding of our veterans, the military men and women killed in battle and not allowed to be recognized in their coffins on their journeys home, and the environmental laws - there are enough of them that have been ruined to bear listing at least twice as part of the bush administration crimes agains humanity.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario